A regulatory proposal that would introduce language testing for certain International Mobility Program (IMP) work permit applicants is moving closer to formal publication, according to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). The department's Forward Regulatory Plan, in a page update dated April 7, 2026, now sets a target of spring or summer 2026 for pre-publication of the proposed amendments in Part I of the Canada Gazette, to be followed by a 30-day public comment period. The initiative was first listed in the Forward Regulatory Plan on July 2, 2025, and has since cleared two rounds of stakeholder engagement — consultations with provinces and territories in February 2025 and with private-sector stakeholders in November 2025 — meaning it is no longer a preliminary entry in a federal planning document. The proposal would amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations to authorize IRCC to require applicants to submit language proficiency test results from a designated third-party organization, with the stated aim of improving the reliability, transparency, and efficiency of language assessments under the IMP. The amendment is not yet in force, no regulatory text is public, and IRCC has not confirmed which IMP streams will be affected, which tests will be accepted, what minimum scores will apply, what exemptions may exist, or when the rule would take effect. Spousal open work permits (SOWPs) are not named by IRCC but are widely regarded by immigration practitioners as the category most likely to be affected. Until the regulatory text is published, no applicant is required to take a language test as a result of this proposal.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has lowered the bar for accepting overseas proof of citizenship applications, instructing officers that applications filed from outside Canada and the United States are now subject only to a minimal completeness check: a file may be returned as incomplete solely when it lacks a required signature, proof of payment, compliant photographs, or a complete application form (CIT 0001), and as long as those minimum legal criteria are met, an officer may accept the application into processing and simply ask the applicant to supply anything else that is missing. The change matters because, under IRCC's general processing rules, an application returned as incomplete is treated as never received — forcing the applicant to pay the fee again, resubmit, and rejoin the back of the queue — and international applicants had previously been turned away on grounds beyond those four items. The new guidance, "Intake of Canadian Citizenship Certificate Applications (Proof of Citizenship)," was published on May 15, 2026 but takes effect retroactively from March 1, 2026, and also reassigns the completeness check for international applications from IRCC's Global Affairs Canada (GAC) division to the Digitization and Identity Operations Division (DIOD). It comes as demand from abroad — driven largely by Americans — has surged in the wake of Bill C-3, which on December 15, 2025 removed the generational limit on citizenship by descent: the proof of citizenship inventory rose 25 percent in May over April to 70,400 applications, pushing expected processing time to 12 months, up from five months in July 2025.

Canada's federal government announced on May 6, 2026 that a sweeping overhaul of the regulatory framework governing the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC) will come into force on July 15, 2026 — the most significant regulatory upgrade since the CICC succeeded the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council (ICCRC) on November 23, 2021. The new rules give the College stronger disciplinary teeth, allow the federal government to step in and take over the College's board if it fails to protect the public, and establish, for the first time, a dedicated compensation fund to provide redress to clients who suffer financial losses because a CICC-licensed consultant engaged in theft, fraud, misappropriation of funds, misrepresentation, or refusal to cooperate with professional liability insurance; at the same time, the College's public register will be expanded with additional disclosures about each licensee, making it easier for the public to verify a consultant's licensing status, good standing, and disciplinary history — and squeezing the operating space of so-called "ghost consultants."